Home Page
   Articles
       links
About Us    
Traders        
Recipes            
Latest Articles
Marine conservation

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Fishing
Author 
 Message
Cathryn



Joined: 16 Jul 2005
Posts: 19829
Location: Ceredigion
PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 11 7:56 am    Post subject: Marine conservation  Reply with quote    

Could this link be stickified at the beginning of this section? I'd find it very handy. Perhaps it should be put at the top of the Recipes, Preserving and Homebrewing section as well?

http://www.fishonline.org/index_old.php

Jamanda
Downsizer Moderator


Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 34865
Location: Devon
PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 11 8:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote    

Done

Hairyloon



Joined: 20 Nov 2008
Posts: 14485
Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.
PostPosted: Sat Mar 16, 13 10:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote    

It says "page not found" now. Though it does still take you to the MCS site.

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 32474
Location: yes
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 14 12:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote    

umm conservation

i recon about 30% would be a good set aside/no take for hunted fish and size limits etc are not effective(lobster/crab are the exception as they go back unharmed and with a full tum)

Hairyloon



Joined: 20 Nov 2008
Posts: 14485
Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 14 1:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote    

dpack wrote:
umm conservation

Umm's are unusual vehicles, but I'm not convinced that they need conserving...

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 32474
Location: yes
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 14 2:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote    

umm's might be safe to drive or robustly long lived but 0.01% is hardly a safe reservation for fish stocks

Hairyloon



Joined: 20 Nov 2008
Posts: 14485
Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 14 2:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote    

dpack wrote:
0.01% is hardly a safe reservation for fish stocks

Very true. Perhaps wee should throw in the Umm's to create artificial reefs?

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 32474
Location: yes
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 14 2:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote    

iirc vehicle parts from tyres to battleships have been used in some places

i suspect it isnt a shortage of habitats but a shortage of safe ,unharvested, habitats that make a difference for fish stocks etc

Lloyd



Joined: 24 Jan 2005
Posts: 2693

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 14 8:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote    

dpack wrote:
iirc vehicle parts from tyres to battleships have been used in some places

i suspect it isnt a shortage of habitats but a shortage of safe ,unharvested, habitats that make a difference for fish stocks etc


THIS

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 32474
Location: yes
PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 14 12:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote    

more harvest from 2/3 of the area rather than a less harvest from all of the area makes sense to me

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Fishing All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1
View Latest Posts View Latest Posts

 

Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group
Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
Copyright 2004 marsjupiter.com

<-- -->