|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
Hairyloon
Joined: 20 Nov 2008 Posts: 15425 Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.
|
|
|
|
|
RichardW
Joined: 24 Aug 2006 Posts: 8443 Location: Llyn Peninsular North Wales
|
|
|
|
|
Pilsbury
Joined: 13 Dec 2004 Posts: 5645 Location: East london/Essex
|
|
|
|
|
Hairyloon
Joined: 20 Nov 2008 Posts: 15425 Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.
|
|
|
|
|
Mistress Rose
Joined: 21 Jul 2011 Posts: 15600
|
Posted: Fri Oct 25, 13 8:48 am Post subject: |
|
Are you talking small or large engine for powering a workshop with several different machines, or power stations for powering large areas?
If the former, probably one large engine, if the latter, the opposite.
My father remembered before the National Grid very vividly. In fact the new house they moved into in London in the 1930s didn't have an electricity supply for a year. He was very much for the National Grid as it made it possible for nearly everywhere to be connected, distribute power round the country and utilise the more efficient power stations first, only bringing in the less efficient ones for high loads.
The down side is that because of losses in the cables, the amount of carbon dioxide generated by producing 1kw of electricity from the grid is currently far more than if you did it locally by using some sort of engine; diesel, gas, coal or wood. I looked into this in 2008 and at that time the ratios were something like 4 times as much carbon dioxide from grid electricity as burning wood directly. This would of course be reduced a bit if you used the burning wood to generate electricity on site, but even at something like 50% efficiency this would still be twice. |
|
|
|
|
Hairyloon
Joined: 20 Nov 2008 Posts: 15425 Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.
|
|
|
|
|
Mistress Rose
Joined: 21 Jul 2011 Posts: 15600
|
|
|
|
|
Hairyloon
Joined: 20 Nov 2008 Posts: 15425 Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.
|
|
|
|
|
Woodburner
Joined: 28 Apr 2006 Posts: 2904 Location: Essex
|
Posted: Fri Oct 25, 13 5:05 pm Post subject: Re: Optimum generator size. |
|
Hairyloon wrote: |
I was just having a debate with a chap who pointed out that it is obviously more efficient to have electricity made in one big power station than in lots of individual little ones.
While it is probably true in terms of economic efficiency, and certainly true if the individual generators are not grid connected, I'm not seeing any real reason it should be the case, and certainly not an obvious one.
Am I just being dense? |
I've been pondering a similar thing but specifically with wind turbines. Smaller ones are less efficient, but safer, so can be closer to habitation. Bigger ones are more efficient, but dangerous, so have to be a long way away from people. Further away = more power lost. I had been wondering if it might be better if communities got together to have 'medium' sized turbines, but have finally managed to find how much is generated by such a turbine, and it's a mere 11kw and I presume that's peak output too. Hardly enough for one household nevermind a community! |
|
|
|
|
Mistress Rose
Joined: 21 Jul 2011 Posts: 15600
|
|
|
|
|
Hairyloon
Joined: 20 Nov 2008 Posts: 15425 Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.
|
|
|
|
|
RichardW
Joined: 24 Aug 2006 Posts: 8443 Location: Llyn Peninsular North Wales
|
|
|
|
|
Woodburner
Joined: 28 Apr 2006 Posts: 2904 Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
RichardW
Joined: 24 Aug 2006 Posts: 8443 Location: Llyn Peninsular North Wales
|
|
|
|
|
Ty Gwyn
Joined: 22 Sep 2010 Posts: 4563 Location: Lampeter
|
|
|
|
|
|