|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
jettejette
Joined: 01 Jun 2013 Posts: 225
|
|
|
|
|
Ty Gwyn
Joined: 22 Sep 2010 Posts: 4563 Location: Lampeter
|
|
|
|
|
Nick
Joined: 02 Nov 2004 Posts: 34535 Location: Hereford
|
|
|
|
|
Nick
Joined: 02 Nov 2004 Posts: 34535 Location: Hereford
|
|
|
|
|
Piggyphile
Joined: 02 Apr 2009 Posts: 891 Location: Galicia
|
|
|
|
|
Behemoth
Joined: 01 Dec 2004 Posts: 19023 Location: Leeds
|
|
|
|
|
Graham Hyde
Joined: 03 Apr 2011 Posts: 365
|
|
|
|
|
Ty Gwyn
Joined: 22 Sep 2010 Posts: 4563 Location: Lampeter
|
|
|
|
|
kGarden
Joined: 01 Dec 2014 Posts: 178 Location: Suffolk, UK
|
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 14 2:48 pm Post subject: |
|
We read (and record, in a spreadsheet) our meter readings (Water and Electricity) each week. I am curious to know, over time, if our energy saving measures are improving compared to a baseline, but I am also keen to know if we have a water leak / something left on.
When an estimated bill comes in if it is higher than the meter reading I pay them, if it is lower I submit my own reading. If the price goes up between now-and-next-time I don't want to, then, pay the higher rate for what I used previously. If the company sends me a high reading I pay it - its their problem if the price goes up before the next reading and, as has happened in the past, it appears that I have used almost nothing in that period. |
|
|
|
|
Behemoth
Joined: 01 Dec 2004 Posts: 19023 Location: Leeds
|
|
|
|
|
Cathryn
Joined: 16 Jul 2005 Posts: 19856 Location: Ceredigion
|
|
|
|
|
jettejette
Joined: 01 Jun 2013 Posts: 225
|
|
|
|
|
Falstaff
Joined: 27 May 2009 Posts: 1014
|
|
|
|
|
Mistress Rose
Joined: 21 Jul 2011 Posts: 15600
|
|
|
|
|
jettejette
Joined: 01 Jun 2013 Posts: 225
|
|
|
|
|
|