jema
|
Should Landscaping be merged with building/Energy EfficiencyThese questions seem to get bogged down in loads of different views that no one seems to have the confidence/ability to distill into a comprensive rehash of the sections and categories of the main site.
So lets pose a simple yes/no suggestion!
I think landscaping is underused and could be merged into "sustainable building/energy efficiency". This would help even up the front page layout and make the articles more visible on the section page:
http://www.downsizer.net/Projects/
Can we try not to let this question expand to far out into how else things should be reorganised, otherwise once again no decision will end up occurring.
|
tahir
|
Yes
|
cab
|
Yes.
|
Bugs
|
Fine by me
|
Treacodactyl
|
You will have to move the hedgelaying to a different section then as it has nothing to do with building.
|
jema
|
| Treacodactyl wrote: | | You will have to move the hedgelaying to a different section then as it has nothing to do with building. |
We would probably have to put landscaping in the title.
|
Treacodactyl
|
But landscaping often goes against sustainable building!
We could do with a "land management" topic being added somewhere, perhaps grow your own or livestock?
|
dougal
|
NO to landscape with building & energy
put landscape with growing things instead
consider merging recycling with energy efficiency (&building) under some "Green Heading"
|
cab
|
Dougal speaks some sense.
|
dougal
|
Some? Some??
|