Some of the Linux fan-boys get very animated about having to pay MS for a license that they don't won't. Then you look at the economics. A system with Linux pre-loaded will cost more...
I can accept the economics make it impractical for most suppliers to stock anything other than machines with Windows on them, but you ought to be able to decline the Windows and get the licence fee refunded.
I am still baffled as to how this is not covered by the monopolies legislation.
vegplot
|
I can accept the economics make it impractical for most suppliers to stock anything other than machines with Windows on them, but you ought to be able to decline the Windows and get the licence fee refunded.
I am still baffled as to how this is not covered by the monopolies legislation. |
It's impractical for them to remove Windows. It simply isn't worth the effort for vendors to remove software. Manufacturers mass produce pre-imaged disks and vendors are very unlikely to support Linux because there's not financial incentive for them to do so. If they did they'd be swamped with technical support trying to get various bits of user installed hardware working. Linux based operating systems are not user or hardware friendly enough for mainstream consumption. It's one of the downsides of a free system.
Monopolies aren't interested as there's no viable mainstream alternative. Linux is fragmented and OSX only runs on Apple hardware.
There another way of looking at it. The popularity of Windows has directly driven down the cost owning a PC far more quickly than would otherwise have happened making them affordable to most people instead of the preserve of the wealthy.
I'm surprised Android hasn't made much of an impact but I suspect that's due to it's focus on the mobile scene.
Hairyloon
|
I can accept the economics make it impractical for most suppliers to stock anything other than machines with Windows on them, but you ought to be able to decline the Windows and get the licence fee refunded.
I am still baffled as to how this is not covered by the monopolies legislation. |
It's impractical for them to remove Windows...
I wasn't suggesting that they did: there is no need. It is not the information on the disk that costs, but the license to use that information as software. If the purchaser does not want to use the software they ought to be able to return the license and write over the disk.
Home Home Home Home Home