Home Page
   Articles
       links
About Us    
Traders        
Recipes            
Latest Articles
who poisoned my river then ?again
Page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Conservation and Environment
Author 
 Message
cab



Joined: 01 Nov 2004
Posts: 32429

PostPosted: Wed Jan 26, 11 12:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Bloody hell, thats a hell of a pollution incident if its dead for two years. What is still getting in to the water?

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 45521
Location: yes
PostPosted: Wed Jan 26, 11 12:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

they have a planning application in for a rebuild ,any objections ?

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 45521
Location: yes
PostPosted: Wed Jan 26, 11 1:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

cab wrote:
Bloody hell, thats a hell of a pollution incident if its dead for two years. What is still getting in to the water?


no idea but sterile since the big one ,not a bug ,not a leech ,not a fungi ,not a plant ,nowt ,cleanstone but not in a good way

well beyond class 5 pollution ,dead in the water ,

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 45521
Location: yes
PostPosted: Wed Jan 26, 11 11:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

im about to object to the planning app

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 45521
Location: yes
PostPosted: Wed Jan 26, 11 11:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

cab wrote:
Bloody hell, thats a hell of a pollution incident if its dead for two years. What is still getting in to the water?


they were formulating herbicides and biocides ,dont know what but the products work

cab



Joined: 01 Nov 2004
Posts: 32429

PostPosted: Wed Jan 26, 11 11:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Want to send me some samples and I'll do some quick and dirty plate counts, see if its dear right down to the microbe?

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 45521
Location: yes
PostPosted: Wed Jan 26, 11 11:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

thanks ,the way it looks the microbe count is very low and the sewers work fine to keep heavy rain in the pipes , very rarely it overflows and flushes but into a raging torrent so it is well diluted and gone soon in the river ,the trout and grayling could cope with that but not with this , the drains are not the problem ..

james , as above ,seems clued up as to the legal process ,thanks mate

would you like to look for extremophiles ?recon anything alive in that water is very hardy

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 45521
Location: yes
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 15 12:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

not forgotten

or forgiven

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 45521
Location: yes
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 15 12:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

ever

they cant even wash their own sign

on the plus side it aint

looking good

and the guilty have names and addresses

Mistress Rose



Joined: 21 Jul 2011
Posts: 15600

PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 15 7:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

The company certainly don't seem to be doing their best to make themselves popular with the locals. I am surprised that the council don't do a compulsory order on the awkward land if it is for a road improvement, even though the money is coming from the company, if that is the real problem.

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 45521
Location: yes
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 15 12:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

with fixed assets of 4.5 and liabilities of 9 i dought they have the money to build a road,and if the courts demand the payments the company wont have any assets at all.

they would be even less popular if the fire brigade hadn't risked life and limb to avoid a yorkshire Bhopal ,it was a close run thing from what i was told.

that type of back street chemical industry should be an ugly footnote to the industrial revolution but the continued use planning rules means no body can shut such places directly on thew grounds of location and other ways have to be found.

Mistress Rose



Joined: 21 Jul 2011
Posts: 15600

PostPosted: Wed Jan 28, 15 7:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

I am rather surprised that after that catastrophe HSE didn't close them down. They may have been doing everything right of course, but quite often sloppy practise of lack of maintenance is at the root of that sort of thing.

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 45521
Location: yes
PostPosted: Wed Jan 28, 15 12:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

lack of maintenance to a building =wet electrics=sparkyfizzley fault=fire iirc.

the problem with such companies is that regulators are always playing catch up,have rather short teeth if it does get messy and lack the legislation and resources to get pre emptive.

think i keep remembering is not that they killed my river but they could have killed a few thousand folk in their sleep if it had gone only slightly differently.the place is very close to a lot of homes .

jamanda
Downsizer Moderator


Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 35056
Location: Devon
PostPosted: Wed Jan 28, 15 8:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Dpack, is anyone in your area doing this?

https://www.riverflies.org/riverfly-recording-schemes

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 45521
Location: yes
PostPosted: Wed Jan 28, 15 9:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

not that i know of ,i now live on the ouse rather than the colne and this river does not seem to have much in the way of clean water flies

it has fish but im not sure what they depend on

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Conservation and Environment All times are GMT
Page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3
View Latest Posts View Latest Posts

 

Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group
Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
Copyright © 2004 marsjupiter.com