|
|
 |
Author |
|
| Message |  |
|
Treacodactyl Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 23890 Location: Jumping on the bandwagon of opportunism
|
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 05 9:26 pm Post subject: Crayfish |
|
I gather our native UK crayfish are endangered and shouldn't be cought and eaten (either it's illegal or you need a licence).
However, there are the US signal crayfish that people say should be removed from our waters and many people trap an eat them.
Do you also need a licence to trap the signals? How do you prevent catching the native ones? Is there any simple government guidelines? |
|
|
|
 |
Rob R
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 26479 Location: York
|
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 05 9:35 pm Post subject: Re: Crayfish |
|
| Treacodactyl wrote: |
| Is there any simple government guidelines? |
Is that not a contradiction in terms?  |
|
|
|
 |
Treacodactyl Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 23890 Location: Jumping on the bandwagon of opportunism
|
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 05 9:43 pm Post subject: Re: Crayfish |
|
| Rob R wrote: |
| Treacodactyl wrote: |
| Is there any simple government guidelines? |
Is that not a contradiction in terms?  |
There are so many people who know a bit about them I thought I'd ask if anyone knew a good link. Doesn't have to be the government, sometimes they have some good details, sometimes you spend ages searching for the most obvious detail.  |
|
|
|
 |
Marigold123
Joined: 06 Feb 2005 Posts: 224
|
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 05 10:36 pm Post subject: Re: Crayfish |
|
| Treacodactyl wrote: |
| How do you prevent catching the native ones? |
Could you just let the native ones go again? |
|
|
|
 |
dougal
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 7184 Location: South Kent
|
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 05 10:37 pm Post subject: |
|
My local cluster of postcodes is exempt from the requirement to have a license to "keep" signals - ie there's an all too well established feral population.
So if I were to come across any, I could take them home and eat them after a couple of days self-purging.
But, it seems that I mustn't try to trap them, although DEFRA etc want them removed, 'cos there's only a facility for issuing such licenses in the Thames region. A trap
So that leaves "fishing"...
At least that's my understanding despite/from following the various recent discussions on River Cottage...
There were several links, including to photos of the Native and the Signal.
I'd like to find that I've got it all wrong - please convince me!
Licenses to "keep" and exemptions http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/regulat/forms/fish/cray2.pdf
Generally, you don't need a license to "keep" for "immediate human consumption", but they usefully list postcodes with Signals...
Ref to prohibitions on "Fixed Engines" http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/subjects/fish/246986/257916/261125/261227/?lang=_e |
|
|
|
 |
sean Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 37907 Location: North Devon
|
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 05 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
I think there are f***-all natives left,IIRC. I'm sure there's an on-line population map somewhere, I'll have a look tomorrow. |
|
|
|
 |
pricey
Joined: 28 Feb 2005 Posts: 6356 Location: Dorset/hants boarder
|
|
|
|
 |
cab
Joined: 01 Nov 2004 Posts: 32429
|
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 05 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
So as my postcode is listed, I'm allowed to catch crayfish (say, with a crab bait bag) as long as I don't trap them?
Why is life so complicated? |
|
|
|
 |
Treacodactyl Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 23890 Location: Jumping on the bandwagon of opportunism
|
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 05 6:57 am Post subject: |
|
Is the reason you cannot trap in case you trap native ones? |
|
|
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 05 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
i think the reason is that you mite transfare the parasite that the amrican carries, as this is what´s killing the native cray fish |
|
|
|
 |
|